e1d3952ffa5a465563e88f40ac2945b8f50f69f1
...because they're hard to find.
Also:
.. at end?
Because this document is kind of a manifesto, I want to retain "They are selected by the people active in those areas". It's Robyn's "do-ocracy"
Good catch. I'll fix that after rebasing to get #130, in which you beat me to correcting Mindshare's existence.
My issue with that it is it sort of mis-represents how things work. The people active in those areas don't select the Council reps. They select (in the case of Mindshare, some of) the people who select the representatives. If it's super important to you, I'll think about how to change the wording to reflect that but also correctly represent the actual process.
On the spectrum of importance to me, from burning red to cool cool violet, it is... yellowish-orange?
rebased onto e1d3952ffa5a465563e88f40ac2945b8f50f69f1
@mattdm does my new commit strike an acceptable compromise?
lgtm
Commit f2f33fa8 fixes this pull-request
Pull-Request has been merged by mattdm
...because they're hard to find.
Also:
for half a decade or more