fdd2888af5d5dca68f1cb0fc1d4da5d760bbfb26
de9fa3359f5ad6cae5daa5a0ae835fcc02d609ee
de88e2d69d299476049962ee4658275996caec4f
7f49010b3b95ab5f32f431bc827387d2a10790e3
ee96a2d0c70fedfa3191206345ee1fe6cb478ff1
This is mostly a significant rewrite of contact.adoc, plus some other changes in other pages.
contact.adoc
rebased onto ee96a2d0c70fedfa3191206345ee1fe6cb478ff1
I don't think this qualifies for inclusion here. I'd argue it's not a change in meaning, just a change in implementation of existing meaning. "Did the Council have to vote on this change?" is a reasonable bar, IMO
We should take this opportunity to tighten the language a bit. "If you have a specific proposal for the Council..." is too tight, but it'd be helpful to make it more clear that tickets are for actions, not discussions. I'd rather have people start "this should be a ticket" threads on Discussion than open "this should be a Discussion thread" tickets, if that makes sense.
1 new commit added
This is just a change of implementation, not governing policy
new wording encouraging discussion over filing tickets
+1 from me
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Pull-request tagged with: needs changes, type - existing docs - Request assigned
This Pull Request is over one year old and has a merge conflict with changes introduced during the 2023 Council hackfest in Frankfurt, Germany.
I superseded this Pull Request with a new one. See #174 for the final changeset.
Pull-Request has been closed by jflory7
This is mostly a significant rewrite of
contact.adoc, plus some other changes in other pages.