#180 Updates to Initiatives page.
Merged by bcotton. Opened by karl0sfandang0.
Fedora-Council/ karl0sfandang0/council-docs issue44-initiatives  into  main

Removal of failing ref to attributes.adoc file.
Change side menu to "Initiatives"
Change reference "Objectives" to "Community Initiatives" on "Get Involved" page

Signed-off-by: Karl Stevens karlosfandango64@gmail.com

I'd like to find a better way to phrase "engineering projects and those from the wider…" but we've long struggled for a good vocabulary here. I won't block on it, but if anyone has suggestions, let's hear them!

Looks good overall, but there's a conflict that prevents merging. Looking at it locally, it seems trivial to fix. In the meantime, let's see if anyone else has feedback.

This should probably be xref:initiatives.adoc?

"6 monthly" is somewhat confusing to me. Maybe instead, "twice annually" or "biannual"?

@bcotton I think we could lean into the vocabulary we have as "Mindshare projects"? I don't think it is perfect, but I think there is at least some greater recognition that this is the other "half" of the community than the things that are more strictly engineering-focused?

Two catches:

  • s/it should to align with/it should align with/
  • This can be expressed as a xref: xref:project.adoc#_our_mission[mission statement]

Metadata Update from @jflory7:
- Pull-request tagged with: type - existing docs

Two catches:

  • Typo: s/Communitiy Initiatives/Community Initiatives/
  • Perhaps we could make this a xref while we are at it? xref:initiatives.adoc[Community Initiatives]?

This should also be one sentence per line.

@bcotton I think we could lean into the vocabulary we have as "Mindshare projects"? I don't think it is perfect, but I think there is at least some greater recognition that this is the other "half" of the community than the things that are more strictly engineering-focused?

Yeah, I suppose that's the best we have.

rebased onto 1ce6cea9e2fb06a1341d29c0348b7051e115a7da

1 new commit added

  • Amendments as per comments on PR#180

1 new commit added

  • Missed the change needed to nav.adoc from jflory7's comment on PR #180. Fixed that here.

We should probably say "Fedora Linux release cycle" here to be consistent with our messaging.

"Council" should be capitalized here.

1 new commit added

  • Fixing for comments on lines 14 and 26 in PR#180

Thanks @bcotton I've fixed for those last 2 comments now.

Merging, thanks @karl0sfandang0!

Pull-Request has been merged by bcotton

@karl0sfandang0 Thanks again for your work here!