18e8c7b8b463cecff851fe36603d7aa5b8851af3
Approved by the Fedora Council: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-02-28/council.2023-02-28-21.05.log.html#l-12
Signed-off-by: Ben Cotton bcotton@fedoraproject.org
This is a trivial change, but since it's to the CoC itself, I wanted to open a PR for visibility. I'll merge in a day or two if there are no objections.
@riecatnor, I'm interested in knowing if you specifically have any concerns with where I recorded the license.
(We could put it in the supporting documentation instead, but It think it's more appropriate (largely for portability reasons) to keep it in the document itself)
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Pull-request tagged with: type - existing docs
rebased onto 18e8c7b8b463cecff851fe36603d7aa5b8851af3
I think we should put the license notice in both the CoC and the CoC supporting documentation. As I understood it, we voted on the licensing for both of these documents in the F2F meeting.
That's not my understanding, and thus it's not what was recorded. If you want to re-license the supporting documentation (which I don't think is necessary because it's a little more specific to Fedora and is CC BY-SA for anyone who really wants to copy our homework), let's do that as a separate issue.
See Fedora-Council/tickets#445
Pull-Request has been merged by bcotton
Approved by the Fedora Council:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-02-28/council.2023-02-28-21.05.log.html#l-12
Signed-off-by: Ben Cotton bcotton@fedoraproject.org
This is a trivial change, but since it's to the CoC itself, I wanted to open a PR for visibility. I'll merge in a day or two if there are no objections.