If we are able to move from 0.7.8 to 0.7.9 version of cloud-init in Fedora 25 we will be able to add support for another cloud provider. I've been told by @larsks that 0.7.9 fixes a lot of bugs and we should probably want to move to it than stay back. I'm still a bit cautious here so let's give the following images a spin and really hammer cloud-init and make a decision.
https://dustymabe.fedorapeople.org/fedora-25-atomic-host-cloud-init-0.7.9.qcow2
https://dustymabe.fedorapeople.org/fedora-25-cloud-base-cloud-init-0.7.9.qcow2
Since we currently don't release updated cloud base images the testing of that image is kind of "extra" but figured I would throw it out there in the hopes we might find a bug that we might not have otherwise.
Metadata Update from @dustymabe: - Issue tagged with: host
@kevin @roshi @larsks @jasonbrooks @jberkus @gholms - please test
Both of those images pass my humble suite of tests.
LGTM.
LGTM
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b8b79a540c
Ok here is a new image to test. Please download it and give karma to the update!
https://dustymabe.fedorapeople.org/fedora-25-atomic-host-cloud-init-final-test-20170328.qcow2
@dustymabe I just tested the new image. It works for me.
@dustymabe Booted successfully here, too. Sanity checks passing, as well. Karma given.
@dustymabe Did some testing with rpm-ostree and atomic cli, everything looks good. Only minor concern is when I attempted to:
# atomic host upgrade Signature made Sun Mar 26 21:05:54 2017 using RSA key ID 4089D8F2FDB19C98 Can't check signature: public key not found
# atomic host upgrade
Signature made Sun Mar 26 21:05:54 2017 using RSA key ID 4089D8F2FDB19C98
Can't check signature: public key not found
error: Commit 6a71adb06bc296c19839e951c38dc0b71ee5d7a82262fef9612f256f0c2a70da: GPG signatures found, but none are in trusted keyring
but:
# cat /etc/ostree/remotes.d/fedora-atomic.conf [remote "fedora-atomic"] url=https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/atomic/25/ gpgverify=false
# cat /etc/ostree/remotes.d/fedora-atomic.conf
[remote "fedora-atomic"]
url=https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/atomic/25/
gpgverify=false
I think I shouldn't be able to upgrade from the test image but the GPG message seems weird. Probably not an issue?
Hey @yzhang - yeah this is a custom image I created and I typo-ed it. Should be gpg-verify=false. You can ignore that issue.
gpg-verify=false
This update has enough karma for stable now. Going to close this issue.
Metadata Update from @dustymabe: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Log in to comment on this ticket.