s/A C3I client need/A C3I client needs/g

Is it worth explaining how and to who this list needs to be provided?

I've just put a couple of comments, beside those it looks great! +1

@gnaponie Thanks for the review.

Is it worth explaining how and to who this list needs to be provided?

I would say to "the C3I Team" in this document since. Maybe @mikeb at the moment?

@gnaponie Thanks for the review.

Is it worth explaining how and to who this list needs to be provided?

I would say to "the C3I Team" in this document since. Maybe @mikeb at the moment?

Should we eventually write that in the documentation? Or maybe that's not the right place?

@gnaponie Thanks for the review.
Is it worth explaining how and to who this list needs to be provided?
I would say to "the C3I Team" in this document since. Maybe @mikeb at the moment?

Should we eventually write that in the documentation? Or maybe that's not the right place?

I would prefer to separate the internal process from the c3i-library. Ideally there should be an internal onboarding process and doc, I think

I would prefer to separate the internal process from the c3i-library. Ideally there should be an internal onboarding process and doc, I think

Yeah, it's a good point.

The PR is good to be merged IMHO.

@gnaponie Great! Thanks.

Let's also keep @mikeb known and see what his opinions will be.