needs to be reviewed by centos board policy
@dcavalca ^ opinions on this one ?

@shaunm is taking care of this

@shaunm : as you're on it (and nothing we can do at this stage at infra and releng side), what about we just close ticket and you can reopen with answer ? or do you prefer a ticket at the centos board tracker ? just reviewing open tickets and trying to not let them in stuck state forever :)

Please donűt close it... I want provide this mirror. :-)

@gergo : while CentOS Board is discussing the trademark potential issue with Red Hat legal, can you describe why you in fact don't point to a real mirror you have, but rather do something like a kind of http nginx cache/reverse proxy that ... points back to us ? (mirror.centos.org)

I understand your question, and I started the deploying a new server with enough space for a right mirror. Please hold open this ticket for some weeks and I will send a new comment when the new site is working.
If the Red Hat legal departement foung some issue with my domain, I am open for a solution and cooperation or etc.

I updated the config to a valid mirror.

I want to update the data with:
Bandwidth: 1000 Mbit/s
RSYNC: rsync://mirror.centos.no/CentOS/
IPv4: 185.46.132.28
Mirroring AltArch: yes
https://mirror.centos.no/centos/altarch/
http://mirror.centos.no/centos/altarch/
rsync://mirror.centos.no/CentOS-AltArch/

@gergo : while CentOS Board is discussing the trademark potential issue with Red Hat legal, can you describe why you in fact don't point to a real mirror you have, but rather do something like a kind of http nginx cache/reverse proxy that ... points back to us ? (mirror.centos.org)

I changed the "http nginx cache/reverse proxy" to a right rsynced mirror 19 days ago. Cloud we please step forward with the "trademark" issue? :-)

no news from @shaunm so ideally you'd open a new ticket with the centos board : https://git.centos.org/centos/board/issues