This is a followup to https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/1578 (I couldn't update this issue as other priorities piled up and I apologize for that)
Could you create a new PV on the cloud-softwarefactory namespace for us?
sf-gateway-data;1Gi;app=sf|run=gateway; ReadWriteOnce
Also what is the name of the storageClass you are using to create the PVs? I need it to test that the ones you created in the previous issue can be used by our deployment.
Thanks!
Metadata Update from @arrfab: - Issue tagged with: centos-ci-infra, feature-request, medium-gain, medium-trouble
@mhuin : we don't have any storageClass for our provisioned PVs as it's "user provisioned" and so just basically NFS under the hood (Amazon EFS)
Metadata Update from @arrfab: - Issue assigned to arrfab
BTW, a new PV was created and you can use these for your PVC :
capacity: storage: 1Gi claimRef: name: sf-gateway-data namespace: cloud-softwarefactory
Metadata Update from @arrfab: - Issue priority set to: Waiting on Reporter (was: Needs Review)
I'm asking because our application requires a storage class name to provision the PersistentVolumeClaims. I fear that if I create a PVC with an incorrect class this might fail?
Based on official documentation, it seems the PVC can be created with empty storageClassName : https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.15/storage/persistent_storage/persistent-storage-nfs.html#persistent-storage-nfs-provisioning_persistent-storage-nfs
storageClassName
@mhuin : as the new PV is in place, can we just close this request ?
Yes, let's. I am working on supporting empty storageClassName in our application. Thanks!
Metadata Update from @arrfab: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Log in to comment on this ticket.