fcb0212200fb13d460cc17d7e0818d7e231adb2a
It technically wasn't NULL initially, it was "", so wasn't being caught in the NULL check. The value stored was "" which was treated as NULL when re-read so the request would eventually lead to a SEGFAULT by doing a strcmp.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1995681
Signed-off-by: Rob Crittenden rcritten@redhat.com
Pull-Request has been merged by rcritten
It technically wasn't NULL initially, it was "", so wasn't being
caught in the NULL check. The value stored was "" which was treated
as NULL when re-read so the request would eventually lead to a
SEGFAULT by doing a strcmp.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1995681
Signed-off-by: Rob Crittenden rcritten@redhat.com