Bug details: ** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170878 ** Information from BlockerBugs App:
Commented but haven't voted yet: kparal
The votes have been last counted at 2023-03-06 15:10 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-845075
To learn how to vote, see: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)
BetaBlocker +1
BetaBlocker
FinalBlocker
BetaFE
FinalFE
0Day
PreviousRelease
+1
0
-1
FinalBlocker +1
FinalBlocker +1 BetaBlocker +1
I'm hesitant to block a security improvement for something out of our control, but... from what we're seeing on Ask Fedora alone, this is going to hit a lot of people — and the current workaround is intermediate level at minimum.
I'm voting for BetaBlocker because I think we should back this out and then only conditionally re-enable it for the final if we can provide a better workaround (and better workaround experience).
And because the Change contingency deadline is given as Beta Freeze.
Yeah, a lot of people are going to see this as the software management mechanisms not working.
The Rules Lawyer™ in me says "this doesn't happen with the default package set, so it's fine" but for the benefit of the project, we really should not ship like this.
Please note that probably a cleaner approach is to let FESCo vote on it. I haven't proposed it to FESCo yet, I'm waiting for developer opinions first, but if there's interest, I can create a FESCo request.
With my FESCo hat on: this is REALLY poor optics. Please bring it to FESCo. I don't think we should let Beta out the door like this.
I think I could vote: BetaBlocker +1 for this as a violation of Basic criterion "The installed system must be able appropriately to install, remove, and update software with the default console tool for the relevant software type..." - it seems reasonable to count this as not being able to "appropriately update software". But I also think it might be a better idea to handle this as a FESCo blocker, as FESCo could then put in place very specific expectations about how they want this addressed, which it seems to merit.
I created a FESCo ticket here: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960
We can continue voting here to present our opinions, but I think we should wait with the resolution on FESCo.
I have had the issue and while it can be resolved, it is really annoying.
(Del this)
Marked the BZ at a Beta blocker as a result of FESCo's decision
AGREED AcceptedBetaBlocker per FESCo decision
The following votes have been closed:
yeah i figured this was still a problem, when i had a problem with it earlier today
Metadata Update from @blockerbot: - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Release F38 is no longer tracked by BlockerBugs, closing this ticket.
Log in to comment on this ticket.