Bug details: ** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236343 ** Information from BlockerBugs App:
Commented but haven't voted yet: adamwill, coremodule
The votes have been last counted at 2023-09-11 18:22 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-873641
To learn how to vote, see: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)
BetaBlocker +1
BetaBlocker
FinalBlocker
BetaFE
FinalFE
0Day
PreviousRelease
+1
0
-1
This is going to be fun.
BetaFE +1
@adamwill Shouldn't we propose it as a FinalBlocker at the same time?
AGREED AcceptedBetaFE
@kparal well, as of right now I'm not 100% sure it technically is one - I think we fulfil the requirements, it's just less elegant and more potentially-foot-shoot-y than the state we had before.
The following votes have been closed:
Discussed during the 2023-09-11 blocker review meeting: [0]
The decision to delay the classification of this as a blocker bug was made as we need to confirm adamw's theory about this affecting the console layout of the installed system before we can confirm whether it's a blocker, adamw will test that today.
[0] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2023-09-11/f39-blocker-review.2023-09-11-16.00.txt
Metadata Update from @blockerbot: - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Release F39 is no longer tracked by BlockerBugs, closing this ticket.
Log in to comment on this ticket.