#1401 [m1n1] m1n1-1.4.2 is available | rhbz#2242749
Closed by blockerbot. Opened by blockerbot.

Bug details: ** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242749 **
Information from BlockerBugs App:
2242749

Current vote summary

Commented but haven't voted yet: adamwill, kparal, frantisekz

The votes have been last counted at 2023-10-11 12:27 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-878246

To learn how to vote, see:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review
A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)


Does Asahi really need us to push stuff stable in order to pull it in, or can it just pull things from updates-testing when needed?

Our image builds follow the same mechanism that Fedora does (that is, composed without updates-testing). Enabling updates-testing often leads to massive breakages, especially with components that bork booting (like the last couple of grub2 updates).

The following votes have been closed:

Our image builds follow the same mechanism that Fedora does (that is, composed without updates-testing).

I think you should introduce an override repo for these purposes. It feels weird to me to process this stuff for Asahi. We spend our time on it, while it doesn't affect any of our deliverables (not even non-blocking ones). Surely Asahi infra is capable of having an extra repo, or similar.

I think you should introduce an override repo for these purposes. It feels weird to me to process this stuff for Asahi. We spend our time on it, while it doesn't affect any of our deliverables (not even non-blocking ones). Surely Asahi infra is capable of having an extra repo, or similar.

I believe the ultimate goal would be to have a Fedora "Asahi" flavor as an official spin, so it'd make sense to have as many as possible packages built in our infra. Also, the time cost our side is tiny from my PoV (I can't speak for releng of how much more pulling in stuff through the freeze adds their side though).

It's the same with Fedora for Phones (I don't remember exactly how it's called), the packages are in our repositories.

I believe the ultimate goal would be to have a Fedora "Asahi" flavor as an official spin, so it'd make sense to have as many as possible packages built in our infra. Also, the time cost our side is tiny from my PoV (I can't speak for releng of how much more pulling in stuff through the freeze adds their side though).

Yes. This is absolutely the goal. We have invested very little in separate infrastructure because our goal is to upstream everything into Fedora as quickly as possible. And we're trying to align our processes with Fedora's so that everyone is used to the rhythm and such.

Metadata Update from @blockerbot:
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

Release F39 is no longer tracked by BlockerBugs, closing this ticket.

Log in to comment on this ticket.

Metadata