Bug details: ** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275099 ** Information from BlockerBugs App:
Commented but haven't voted yet: coremodule
The votes have been last counted at 2024-04-15 18:44 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-905613
To learn how to vote, see: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)
BetaBlocker +1
BetaBlocker
FinalBlocker
BetaFE
FinalFE
0Day
PreviousRelease
+1
0
-1
I might feel blockery about this and cannot make the meeting today
FinalBlocker +1
but if you think we are good with this, too, I do not object.
I'm okay with waiving this one. IIUC this could be resolved by just updating after installation (when the update is available), the system is otherwise okay and, while maybe inconvenient, you are able to use the system. Blockery, but not worth slipping IMO.
FinalBlocker -1
AGREED RejectedFinalBlocker AGREED AcceptedFinalFE
Discussed during the 2024-04-15 blocker review meeting: [0]
The decision to classify this bug as a "RejectedBlocker (Final)" and an "AcceptedFreezeException (Final)" was made as our testing during the meeting suggests this is almost 100% reproducible on libvirt/qemu VMs (especially without 3D passthrough), but not reproducible at all on bare metal. That makes this a conditional violation of the "basic functionality" criterion for default apps and the default panel functionality criterion, but we judge that it's not severe enough to constitute a blocker, but it is bad enough to grant an FE.
[0] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/blocker-review_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-04-15/f40-blocker-review.2024-04-15-16.00.txt
The following votes have been closed:
Metadata Update from @blockerbot: - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Release F40 is no longer tracked by BlockerBugs, closing this ticket.
Log in to comment on this ticket.