Bug details: ** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275628 ** Information from BlockerBugs App:
Commented but haven't voted yet: robatino
The votes have been last counted at 2024-04-18 10:17 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-905857
To learn how to vote, see: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)
BetaBlocker +1
BetaBlocker
FinalBlocker
BetaFE
FinalFE
0Day
PreviousRelease
+1
0
-1
FinalFE -1
The changes in the new version aren't enough to grant a new rc iso.
It's proposed as a FE, not a blocker.
If a new RC is composed for any reason, including the latest Firefox is a good idea, because it fixes a lot of CVEs and it's going to stay frozen on the release image for a long time.
FinalFE +1
I originally proposed this because I thought there might be serious issues with Fedora's 125.0 relative to 125.0.1 which couldn't be fixed with an update. According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275628#c4 it appears this is not the case. OTOH kparal has a point in that 125.0 itself has important fixes. Not going to vote, just wanted to make sure this was looked at. Right now firefox-125.0-1.fc40 is in Bodhi and has already been submitted to stable ( https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-c6a1d4e0ec ) so it appears it will be available as a 0-day.
Metadata Update from @blockerbot: - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Release F40 is no longer tracked by BlockerBugs, closing this ticket.
Log in to comment on this ticket.