Bug details: ** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354865 ** Information from BlockerBugs App:
The votes have been last counted at 2025-03-27 19:34 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-963158
To learn how to vote, see: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)
BetaBlocker +1
BetaBlocker
FinalBlocker
BetaFE
FinalFE
0Day
PreviousRelease
+1
0
-1
I'm skeptical that we can fix this quickly enough, and it might not even be a good idea (to change the most important library under packagekit so shortly before a new release). But I think it does violate our release criterion: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Final_Release_Criteria#Installing,_removing_and_updating_software
Especially this one:
The displayed state of software or software sources must not differ from their actual state.
This assumes there's only one true repo state for the whole system. It doesn't account for what this bug caused, i.e. different parts of the system seeing the repo state differently. But that only accentuates the the problem, and shows that this is not a valid state based on our criteria.
I think this should be accepted as a blocker, and realistically, maybe marked as "hard-to-fix" and bumped to the next release (when we should definitely fix it), unless the libdnf change happens to be really trivial (which I doubt).
FinalBlocker +1
going by the criteria it's a
yeah, I have to agree with Kamil's evaluation here. FinalBlocker +1 AGREED AcceptedFinalBlocker
The following votes have been closed:
Metadata Update from @blockerbot: - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Release F42 is no longer tracked by BlockerBugs, closing this ticket.
Log in to comment on this ticket.