Bug details: ** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392501 ** Information from BlockerBugs App:
The votes have been last counted at 2025-09-26 09:05 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-987305
To learn how to vote, see: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)
BetaBlocker +1
BetaBlocker
FinalBlocker
BetaFE
FinalFE
0Day
PreviousRelease
+1
0
-1
As simple-scan comes installed at the live iso, it must comply with this criterion here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_43_Final_Release_Criteria#Default_application_functionality
FinalBlocker +1
FinalBlocker -1 FinalFE +1
As document scanner is not part of the default application functionality criteria and we dropped the all pre-installed apps must work criteria. I am -1 for blocker but would still like to see this fixed as added a FE.
Dropping the "all pre-installed apps must work" criteria was a bad decision in my opinion, but it is what it is.
So...
FinalFE +1
Read again :-)
Yeah, unfortunate, but we deemed it necessary.
I am glad the bug will get fixed in time before F43 release. I disagree with the approach of shipping apps that don't work - it damages the reputation of Fedora. IMO, it would be better to exclude non-functional apps from the default install. It's better not being there instead of promising something that it can't hold up to. Anyway, I guess that needs to be discussed elsewhere. Small note the the Default application functionality (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_43_Final_Release_Criteria#Default_application_functionality), it lists problem reporter. That is ridiculous as 99% of users don't go into bz and create an API key to even being able to report an issue.
FinalBlocker -1 FinalFE +1 AGREED RejectedFinalBlocker AcceptedFinalFE
The following votes have been closed:
Small note the the Default application functionality (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_43_Final_Release_Criteria#Default_application_functionality), it lists problem reporter. That is ridiculous as 99% of users don't go into bz and create an API key to even being able to report an issue.
That's normal. Most people don't ever report anything. It's fine, they are general users. We rely on the 1% of enthusiasts to receive useful information (there's higher signal-to-noise ratio from them, also). If even they can't report bugs, then we have 0 bugs in bugzilla... and are happy, I guess? Btw, Abrt sends FAF reports even without bz apikey, that's needed just for the full report. Anyway, happy to discuss this on fedora discussion, just create a thread.
Metadata Update from @blockerbot: - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Release F43 is no longer tracked by BlockerBugs, closing this ticket.