Issue #1962: [python-Bottleneck] python-Bottleneck: Please rebuild in Fedora 43 | rhbz#2396764 - blocker-review

fedora-qa / blocker-review

#1962 [python-Bottleneck] python-Bottleneck: Please rebuild in Fedora 43 | rhbz#2396764

Closed Oct 27, 2025 by blockerbot. Opened Oct 7, 2025 by blockerbot.

Bug details: ** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2396764 **
Information from BlockerBugs App:
2396764

Current vote summary

Rejected FinalFreezeException (+1, 0, -4)
- +1 by besser82
- -1 by adamwill, nielsenb, kparal, lruzicka

The votes have been last counted at 2025-10-20 15:34 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-990142

To learn how to vote, see:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review
A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)

kparal commented Oct 9, 2025

Packages with old .pyc files will have slower import times and might
report AVC denials in restricted contexts. However, they remain
functional, there is no need to panic.

I'm not seeing a strong reason to approve FE for this. It's functional, and I'm not seeing any AVCs when I import the old version (not sure what restricted contexts are, though).

I assume this is not the only update that wasn't pushed before freeze - do we want to manage FEs for all of them?

besser82 commented Oct 12, 2025

FinalFE +1

adamwill commented Oct 13, 2025

FinalFE -1
'get correct bytecode' doesn't really feel like enough of a reason for a freeze exception, especially since I don't think this is on any media(?)

nielsenb commented Oct 13, 2025

Can be fixed in an update.

FinalFE -1

kparal commented Oct 14, 2025

FinalFE -1

lruzicka commented Oct 20, 2025

The package is not installed by default, so there is no need it has an FE.

FinalFE -1

adamwill commented Oct 20, 2025

AGREED RejectedFinalFE

blockerbot commented Oct 20, 2025

The following votes have been closed: