Bug details: ** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366216 ** Information from BlockerBugs App:
Commented but haven't voted yet: nielsenb, adamwill
The votes have been last counted at 2025-10-20 19:03 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-990189
To learn how to vote, see: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)
BetaBlocker +1
BetaBlocker
FinalBlocker
BetaFE
FinalFE
0Day
PreviousRelease
+1
0
-1
Hmmm. FinalFE +1 I guess
Seems relatively safe.
FinalFE +1
Is this installed by default on any media? Why does this need a FE?
See the proposal.
Discussed at the blocker review meeting on 20th Oct. 2025
AGREED AcceptedFinalFreezeException
This is accepted based on the justification in the bug, to get the vulnerability addressed ASAP and avoid a post-release version bump.
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/blocker-review_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-10-20/f43-blocker-review.2025-10-20-16.02.html
The following votes have been closed:
Metadata Update from @blockerbot: - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Release F43 is no longer tracked by BlockerBugs, closing this ticket.
Log in to comment on this ticket.