Not sure the best criteria to apply, Window manager functionality perhaps?

BetaBlocker +1

BetaBlocker +1

BetaBlocker +1

BetaBlocker +1

@nielsenb the criterion can just be 'any criterion requiring a functional desktop', but the key point is we have to make an evaluation per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Blocker_Bug_FAQ#What_about_hardware_and_local_configuration_dependent_issues? since this is a hardware-dependent issue.

For me, as the affected hardware appears to be something like "quite a lot of Lenovos with Intel graphics" (and possibly other brands too), I can be:

BetaBlocker +1

as that's a very common hardware config for running Fedora.

AGREED AcceptedBetaBlocker

The following votes have been closed:

• Accepted BetaBlocker (+5, 0, -0)
  • +1 by nielsenb, derekenz, lruzicka, psklenar, adamwill

I'm calling for a re-vote on this one, see here. It'll likely come up at go/no-go.

REVOTE BetaBlocker

for the comments on the ticket, I'll go for release the beta with a known issue.

BetaBlocker -1

BetaBlocker 0

I don't see this on my machine that uses the i915 driver. Feels very hardware specific based on ticket comments.

BetaBlocker -1

Adam, I added the REVOTE command to your comment, so that people's new votes actually count.

This is too hardware specific, with very few people being affected at this moment:
BetaBlocker -1

Anubis ate my reasoning, I give up.

BetaBlocker -1

Given that it doesn't seem widespread...

BetaBlocker -1

During Beta Go/NoGo meeting [1]:

!agreed 2438442 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) - this is rejected as we have no clear indication it affects a very wide range of hardware. It's only positively confirmed to affect certain variants of a single laptop model (Thinkpad P14s with 120Hz screen). Per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Blocker_Bug_FAQ#What_about_hardware_and_local_configuration_dependent_issues? our decision is that's not broad enough to merit the bug being a Beta blocker

[1] https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2026-03-05/

AGREED RejectedBetaBlocker

The following votes have been closed:

• Rejected BetaBlocker (+0, 1, -5)
  • 0 by derekenz
  • -1 by geraldosimiao, nielsenb, kparal, lruzicka, kevin

Discussed in a blocker review meeting [1] on 2026-03-09. The outcome was:

!agreed 2438442 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - this is rejected per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Blocker_Bug_FAQ#What_about_hardware_and_local_configuration_dependent_issues? , because so far we still have no indication this affects more than a single laptop model, and blocking the release for a workaroundable issue on a single laptop model isn't really in line with past reality. Note "Bugs that affect only a single adapter or small group of closely-related adapters are almost never taken as blockers" in the FAQ.

[1] https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org//blocker-review_matrix_fedoraproject-org/

AGREED RejectedFinalBlocker

The following votes have been closed:

• Rejected FinalBlocker (+0, 0, -0)