#2033 [compiz] Compiz no longer decorates windows since recent dnf update of various other packages | rhbz#2437512
Opened by blockerbot. Modified

Bug details: ** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2437512 **
Information from BlockerBugs App:
2437512

Current vote summary

The votes have been last counted at 2026-02-27 02:09 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-1006992

To learn how to vote, see:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review
A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)


If compiz isn't the compositor for any blocking desktop, as stated by @adamwill on the ticket, I don't see how this can be a blocker.

BetaBlocker -1

I agree with the above. This is clearly not BB King, nor even just a BB.

BetaBlocker -1

Not a blocker but happy to give it a Freeze Exception.

BetaBlocker -1
BetaFE +1

I think they misunderstood what the blocker tracker bug means. Anyway:
BetaBlocker -1

AGREED RejectedBetaBlocker

The following votes have been closed:

If compiz is the compositor for any shipped spin, I'd be fine with +1 FE for this. Is it still used on the MATE spin? Are we still doing the MATE spin?

It seems we are=E2=80=A6=E2=80=A6..
https://fedoraproject.org/spins/mate/

Derek Enz
@derekenz:fedora.im

On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 2:53=E2=80=AFPM Adam Williamson pagure@pagure.io =
wrote:

adamwill added a new comment to an issue you are following:
If compiz is the compositor for any shipped spin, I'd be fine with +1 FE for this. Is it still used on the MATE spin? Are we still doing the MATE spin?

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/2033

It's part of the MATE spin still.

BetaFE +1

BetaFE +1
AGREED AcceptedBetaFE

The following votes have been closed:

Log in to comment on this ticket.

Metadata