Bug details: ** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935773 ** Information from BlockerBugs App:
Commented but haven't voted yet: churchyard, sgallagh
The votes have been last counted at 2021-03-10 13:57 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-720162
To learn how to vote, see: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)
BetaBlocker +1
BetaBlocker
FinalBlocker
BetaFE
FinalFE
0Day
PreviousRelease
+1
0
-1
Justification in the bug seems reasonable: BetaFE +1
BetaFE +1
AGREED AcceptedBetaFE
The following votes have been closed:
BetaFE -1
Fedora Beta does not need this change, RHEL 10 does. And I've been told by @sgallagh that RHEL 10 will now take packages that are submitted to stable, regardless the freeze, so the exception is not needed.
As @churchyard says, this is intended for RHEL 9 whose development is currently syncing from Fedora 34 (ELN is actually a red herring here; it's off in the mystical RHEL 10 future now). We have changed the sync process so that f34-updates-testing-pending is sufficient to bring it across, so this is not needed for F34 and it's unnecessary to introduce (low) potential risk to the Beta.
f34-updates-testing-pending
Metadata Update from @blockerbot: - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Release F34 is no longer tracked by BlockerBugs, closing this ticket.
Log in to comment on this ticket.