Bug details: ** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055346 ** Information from BlockerBugs App:
Commented but haven't voted yet: coremodule
The votes have been last counted at 2022-02-21 16:35 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-782629
To learn how to vote, see: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)
BetaBlocker +1
BetaBlocker
FinalBlocker
BetaFE
FinalFE
0Day
PreviousRelease
+1
0
-1
FinalBlocker -1 For me, this isn't violating the criterion. The criterion doesn't require the fields be exactly as intended (assuming this change was an error and not intentional). It just requires that they properly identify the edition, which they still do.
FinalBlocker -1
Edition name is included, cited self-identification criteria doesn't apply. I would still like to see the complete compose information included however.
AGREED RejectedFinalBlocker
The following votes have been closed:
Metadata Update from @blockerbot: - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Release F36 is no longer tracked by BlockerBugs, closing this ticket.
Log in to comment on this ticket.